5.4. Requirement Management¶
5.4.1. Change Control Board¶
There are the following actors involved:
- RTEMS users: Everyone using the RTEMS real-time operating system to design, develop and build an application on top of it.
- RTEMS developers: The persons developing and maintaining RTEMS. They write patches to add or modify code, requirements, tests and documentation.
- RTEMS maintainers: They are listed in the MAINTAINERS file and have write access to the project repositories.
Adding and changing requirements follows the normal patch review process. The normal patch review process is described in the RTEMS User Manual. Reviews and comments may be submitted by anyone, but a maintainer review is required to approve significant changes. In addition for significant changes, there should be at least one reviewer with a sufficient independence from the author which proposes a new requirement or a change of an existing requirement. Working in another company on different projects is sufficiently independent. RTEMS maintainers do not know all the details, so they trust in general people with experience on a certain platform. Sometimes no review comments may appear in a reasonable time frame, then an implicit agreement to the proposed changes is assumed. Patches can be sent at anytime, so controlling changes in RTEMS requires a permanent involvement on the RTEMS developer mailing list.
For a qualification of RTEMS according to certain standards, the requirements may be approved by an RTEMS user. The approval by RTEMS users is not the concern of the RTEMS Project, however, the RTEMS Project should enable RTEMS users to manage the approval of requirements easily. This information may be also used by a independent authority which comes into play with an Independent Software Verification and Validation (ISVV). It could be used to select a subset of requirements, e.g. look only at the ones approved by a certain user. RTEMS users should be able to reference the determinative content of requirements, test procedures, test cases and justification reports in their own documentation. Changes in the determinative content should invalidate all references to previous versions.