You can think of the change log as a conceptual ``undo list'' which explains how earlier versions were different from the current version. People can see the current version; they don't need the change log to tell them what is in it. What they want from a change log is a clear explanation of how the earlier version differed.
The change log file is normally called `ChangeLog
' and covers an
entire directory. Each directory can have its own change log, or a
directory can use the change log of its parent directory--it's up to
you.
Another alternative is to record change log information with a version
control system such as RCS or CVS. This can be converted automatically
to a `ChangeLog
' file.
There's no need to describe the full purpose of the changes or how they work together. If you think that a change calls for explanation, you're probably right. Please do explain it---but please put the explanation in comments in the code, where people will see it whenever they see the code. For example, ``New function'' is enough for the change log when you add a function, because there should be a comment before the function definition to explain what it does.
However, sometimes it is useful to write one line to describe the overall purpose of a batch of changes.
The easiest way to add an entry to `ChangeLog
' is with the Emacs
command M-x add-change-log-entry. An entry should have an
asterisk, the name of the changed file, and then in parentheses the name
of the changed functions, variables or whatever, followed by a colon.
Then describe the changes you made to that function or variable.
Packaging copyright © 1988-2000 OAR Corporation Context copyright by each document's author. See Free Software Foundation for information.